shRNA (3+1) Virus Packaging

경험적으로 디자인된 shRNA의 knockdown 효과는 종종 서로간에 관찰되는 특이성과 효율성의 변화에 ​​의해 제한된다. 따라서 여러 shRNA를 테스트하여 GOI를 knockdown하는 가장 강력한 shRNA를 찾는 것이 중요하다. VectorBuilder의 shRNA (3 + 1) 바이러스 패키징 서비스를 사용하면 매우 경제적인 가격으로 타겟 유전자에 가장 적합한 shRNA를 선택할 수 있다. 이는 GOI를 타겟으로 하는 3개의 custom shRNA 바이러스와 1개의 scramble control 바이러스를 클로닝 및 패키징하는 것을 포함한다. 현재 이용 가능한 바이러스 유형에는 lentivirus, AAV 및 adenovirus가 포함된다.

Ordering Information

Virus Type Scale & Deliverable  Application Price (USD)* Turnaround**
Lentivirus Pilot Cell culture $1,248 15-28 days
Medium $1,748
Large $2,748
Ultra-purified medium Cell culture & in vivo $3,948
Ultra-purified large $4,748
AAV Pilot Cell culture $1,248 17-30 days
Medium $1,748
Large $2,748
Ultra-purified pilot Cell culture & in vivo $3,848 23-38 days
Ultra-purified medium $5,348
Ultra-purified large $8,148
Adenovirus Pilot Cell culture $1,648 32-50 days
Medium $2,148
Large $3,148
Ultra-purified medium Cell culture & in vivo $4,348 34-54 days
Ultra-purified large $5,148

* 가격에는 벡터 제작 및 바이러스 패키징이 모두 포함되어 있다.

** 소요시간에는 벡터 제작 및 바이러스 패키징에 대한 생산 시간이 포함된다. 최종 결과물을 고객에게 배송하기 위한 운송 시간은 포함되지 않는다.

아래 Vector Picker를 사용하여 GOI에 대한 세가지 shRNA를 선택하세요.

위의 Vector Picker는 U6 기반 shRNA 벡터에만 적용된다. miR30 기반 shRNA 벡터가 필요하거나 Vector Picker를 사용하여 대상 유전자에 대해 원하는 shRNA를 찾을 수 없는 경우, 요구사항을 디자인 의뢰하기로 보내 주시면 당사의 전문가가 shRNA 벡터를 디자인할 것이다.

Technical Information

Vector systems offered

현재 shRNA (3 + 1) 바이러스 패키징 서비스에 사용할 수 있는 바이러스 유형은 lentivirus, AAV 및 adenovirus이다. 이러한 모든 벡터 시스템은 E. coli에서 높은 카피 수의 복제, 살아있는 바이러스의 높은 titer 패키징 및 호스트 세포에 효율적인 transduction이 최적화되어 있다. shRNA 발현은 human U6 promoter에 의해 유도되어 transduction된 세포 내에서 타겟 유전자 mRNA의 분해를 유도한다. AAV 패키징의 경우 다음 serotype을 제공한다: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6.2, 7, 8, 9, rh10, DJ, DJ/8, PHP.eB, PHP.S, AAV2-retro, AAV2-QuadYF and AAV2.7m8.

Lentiviral Vector

Guide

AAV Vector

Guide

Adenoviral Vector

Guide

FAQ

Which viral vector should I use?

Common viral vectors used in biomedical research include lentivirus, adeno-associated virus (AAV) and adenovirus each with its advantages and disadvantages. The table below lists key factors that should be taken into consideration while selecting the right viral vector for your experiment.

Lentivirus AAV Adenovirus
Tropism Broad Depending on viral serotype Ineffective for some cells
Can infect non-dividing cells? Yes Yes Yes
Stable integration or transient? Stable integration Transient, episomal Transient, episomal
Maximum titer High High Very High
Promoter customization Yes Yes Yes
Primary use Cell culture and in vivo In vivo In vivo
Immune response in vivo Low Very low High
How is viral titer determined at VectorBuilder?

After harvesting viral particles, if the viral vector carries a fluorescent reporter gene, we usually first check the quality of virus by transducing the virus into some common cell lines (e.g. 293T or 293A) to observe the expression of fluorescent protein. Different methods are then used to quantify the titer of virus depending on viral type. Occasionally, if there is a major discrepancy between fluorescence observation and quantitative measurement, we will perform re-measurement or additional validation to ensure that viruses manufactured by VectorBuilder are of high quality.

Lentivirus

We use p24 Elisa for measuring lentivirus titer. This method employs a sandwich immunoassay to measure the levels of the HIV-1 p24 core protein in lentiviral supernatants. The lentivirus samples are first added to a microtiter plate, the wells of which are coated with an anti-HIV-1 p24 capture antibody, to bind the p24 in the lentivirus samples. This is followed by the addition of a biotinylated anti-p24 secondary antibody, which in turn binds to the p24 captured by the first antibody on the plate. A streptavidin-HRP conjugate is then added for binding the biotinylated anti-p24 antibody due to the interaction between streptavidin and biotin. A substrate solution is ultimately added to the samples which produces color upon interaction with HRP. The intensity of the colored product is proportional to the amount of p24 present in each lentivirus sample, which is measured by the use of a spectrophotometer and is then precisely quantified by comparing against a recombinant HIV-1 p24 standard curve. The p24 value is then correlated with the viral titer of the corresponding lentivirus sample.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)

We measure the physical titer of AAV by directly extracting viral genome from lysed viral particles, and then using qPCR to accurately quantify the copy number of viral genome (using the copy number of ITR region as a proxy) in the stock. AAV particles are very stable. In our AAV preparation, viral particles are essentially all alive and can remain functional at room temperature for many days. As such, the physical titer, though not measured in a way involving the transduction of cells, is very close to the functional titer.

Adenovirus

For adenovirus, we also measure the functional titer. After transducing serially diluted adenovirus into 293A cells, we use an immunocytochemistry-based approach to count the number of cells being successfully transduced via the detection of adenovirus-specific hexon protein, and each immunostained cell is considered as one infectious unit. Cells are infected at very low multiplicity of infection (MOI) to ensure that most transduced cells are each infected by a single viral particle. This assay shows good correlation with conventional plaque assay. For ultra-purified adenovirus, we directly measure the optical density (using OD260) of the viral particles to estimate titer, because there is a tight correlation between the optical density of ultra-purified adenovirus and functional titer. Adenovirus has very good stability. In our preparation, the viral particles are essentially all alive and can remain functional at room temperature for many days.

How is shRNA knockdown score calculated?

VectorBuilder applies rules similar to that used by the RNAi consortium (TRC) to design and score shRNAs. For each given RefSeq transcript, we search for all possible 21mers that are considered as candidate target sites. Candidates are excluded if they contain features thought to reduce knockdown efficiency/specificity or cloneability, including a run of ≥4 of the same base, a run of ≥7 G or C, GC content <25% or>60%, and AA at the 5’ end. Knockdown scores are penalized for candidates that contain internal stem-loop, high GC content toward the 3’ end, known miRNA seed sequences, or off-target matches to other genes. For genes with alternative transcripts, target sites that exist in all transcripts are given higher scores.

All scores are ≥0, with mean at ~5, standard deviation at ~5, and 95% of scores ≤15. An shRNA with a knockdown score about 15 is considered to have the best knockdown performance and cloneability, while an shRNA with a knockdown score of 0 has the worst knockdown performance or is hard to be cloned.

Please note that knockdown scores are only a rough guide. Actual knockdown efficiency could depart significantly from what the scores predict. Target sites with low scores may still work well. Also, please note that targeting 3’ UTR can be as effective as targeting coding region.

Why isn't my shRNA knocking down my gene of interest?
Not all shRNAs will work

Based on our experience and feedback from our customers, we know that generally when 3 or 4 shRNAs are tested for any arbitrary gene, typically 2 or 3 produce reasonable to good knockdown. However, when using shRNAs, it is important to recognize the fact that not all shRNAs will work. Typically, ~50-70% of shRNAs have noticeable knockdown effect, and ~20-30% of them have strong knockdown. If you try a few shRNAs targeting a specific gene, it is possible that by chance, none will produce satisfactory knockdown. When this happens, the best approach is to try more shRNAs, especially the ones that have literature validation. Many researchers also use a “cocktail” of shRNAs (i.e. mixture of different shRNAs) targeting the same gene, which sometimes can improve knockdown efficiency.

The assay for validating the knockdown of your gene is not performed properly

The most common and sensitive assay to evaluate shRNA knockdown efficiency is RT-qPCR. Sometimes, you may need to try several pairs of primers, and then choose the most specific and efficient pair to use. In general, the RT-qPCR primers should span exon-exon junction if possible to avoid amplifying genomic DNA. When using a new pair of primers, we recommend that you run the PCR product on an agarose gel to verify the band, or even validate the PCR product by sequencing. You should always include minus-RT control in RT-qPCR to better estimate the level of genomic DNA contamination. You can use NCBI primer designing tool to help you better examine the quality of your primers in silico.

Knockdown efficiency can also be assessed by Western blot. However, Western blot is notoriously prone to false positive bands from non-specific antibody binding, which could mistakenly lead to the interpretation that there is no knockdown. Care must therefore be taken to make sure that the antibody used is indeed specific to the gene of interest.

The shRNA might only target a subset of transcript isoforms of your gene

When designing shRNA, we generally recommend those that can target as many transcript isoforms of the gene as possible, unless you are only interested in knocking down a particular isoform. VectorBuilder has created shRNA databases that contain optimized shRNAs for common species. If you design shRNA vectors on VectorBuilder, when you insert the shRNA component into the vector, you will have the option to search the target gene in our database. Then, you will see the detailed information of all the available shRNAs we designed for you, including a link to UCSC Genome Browser to view these shRNAs in the context of genomic sequence and all the transcript isoforms.